Home Recommended Products Contact Us
Resources & Links
Fatherlessness Statistics
Child Support
Legal Resources
Search This Site
Bad Judges List
Free Templates
Restraining Orders
Judicial Abuse Stories
Father's Stories
Legal Help & Referrals
Constitutional Rights
Table of Contents
Terms & Conditions
Signup for Newsletter
Search Site
   Since its inception the Equal Justice Foundation has worked closely with Erin Pizzey, e.g. see Corry, Fiebert, and Pizzey. Erin opened one of the very first refuges (shelters) for abused women in Chiswick, London, in 1971, and her 1974 book Scream Quietly Or The Neighbors Will Hear brought the problem of domestic violence to the world's attention. The EJF has thus had a continuing interest in the availability and utility of shelters for both women and men.
    Billions have now been spent establishing shelters for battered women. Such shelters can presently be found in virtually all metropolitan areas. We think few begrudge money used to provide a safe haven for women and children in distress. Any society that is to survive must make the safety of pregnant women and children one of its first priorities. However, there are increasing questions about the effectiveness of battered women's shelters, both in terms of cost, results, and credibility.
     In an effort to rectify the abuses and preserve the benefits of shelters, the EJF presents an extensive list of problems in the hope that the veil of secrecy that covers and condones such corruption can be lifted and the problems corrected. Toward that end the work, presented below, of True Equality Network, and its president Terri Lynn Tersak, is a very welcome addition.
Charles E. Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A.     

Shelters Of Ill Repute
© 2006 Terri Lynn Tersak, True Equality Network
Used with permission of the author

    Jane Williamson (not her real name) is just one woman who was victimized by the failure of the domestic violence support system. Jane suffered repeated blows to the side of her head. She went to an abuse shelter, complained about ringing in her right ear and blurred vision in her eye. The shelter staff was unable to detect any visible signs of her partner's assault. They told her the symptoms would soon clear up, then sent her off to see a psychiatrist.
    Within a few days Jane became deaf in that ear and blind in one eye. She will never recover her senses. Her attacker never saw a single minute in jail, nor did he pay a cent toward her medical bills.
   Sadly, cases like Jane's are common. Indeed, the majority of nearly 10,000 women who work with the True Equality Network have been in Jane Williamson's shoes themselves - beaten and forgotten.
    I encounter a frightening number of victims of severe battery who recount an eerily similar story; they went through the courts and almost immediately things got worse for them.
    I have experienced this myself, personally. The way things operate today you are better off leaving town and changing your name than dialing 911 after being beaten by an intimate partner. An expansive annotated list of government and academic studies supporting this concern is in the article Domestic Violence Awareness Month by Richard L. Davis.

Profiting from DV one way or another
   If a woman does seek shelter, as so widely touted by the DV ads, what is likely to happen?
   True Equality Network conducted an abuse shelter investigation in twenty-one states. This investigation involves having women go to a shelter  saying she needs help. The laws in most states permit women to stay in a shelter for 72 hours without filing a complaint to cover the needs of those who "escape" during weekend and holiday periods when the courts are closed. This open period of access was used to learn how the shelter operates without filing a complaint.
    After only a few months this investigation uncovered illegal operations, including shelters operating prostitution services, drug dealing, and shelter staffers arranging to have the shelter clients provide sexual favors to law enforcement officers in exchange for the officers' perjured testimony in court. In one eastern state our investigator made an anonymous tip to the local law enforcement agency that resulted in the arrest of two sheriffs deputies working as pimps for a prostitution service.
    The women of True Equality Network have spent almost five years in the courthouses of 97 counties across 17 states. During this period they have interviewed over 15,000 plaintiffs in domestic violence cases just before they entered the courtroom. The overwhelming number of those interviewed did not attempt to mask the real reasons they filed a domestic violence charge: control, money, and revenge - for everything you could possibly imagine - everything, that is, except acts of domestic violence.
     Subsequently, True Equality Network asked prominent members of the counties in which the plaintiff surveys were conducted to interview the judges who heard these cases. Every single one of the judges interviewed corroborated the study's findings of pervasive levels of false claims of domestic violence in their court. These judges also state they know that the attorneys in these cases - including Legal Services Corporation grantees - are suborning perjury by scripting the statements of these women. Moreover, they expressed concern that their district attorneys were not prosecuting these acts.

Violence Against Women Act: The fast food of law
   If misery loves company then the one success of VAWA has been to make sure victims of extreme domestic brutalities have plenty of company.  
  As I reflect on my own experiences with domestic violence and the pretense of help our abuse system claims to offer, I find myself grieving most for today's victims. As the years pass, our domestic violence systems under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) offer less and less help to the most severely battered, but ever increasing rewards for those who manipulate the systems.
     Why do we not only keep such a failure operating, but also expand its influence and funding year after year? I believe it follows the same logic as our society's affinity for fast food - instant gratification. It is quick, easy to get, and satisfies an immediate desire.
     However, that satisfaction is hollow and short lived, and often creates unintended, unexpected problems for truly battered women and men. Meanwhile, the promoters make a fortune selling their ineffective and often harmful product. In order to keep the money rolling in, they must actively promote it to keep people believing in it, wanting it, and convinced it is a good thing for everyone, irrespective of the facts. To these ends, each year we dedicate a month to promote everything the Violence Against Women Act pretends to bring us, under the guise of protecting women from abuse and providing help to those that have suffered it.

Money is the root of this evil
    American taxpayers support the VAWA and other domestic violence programs to the tune of more than $1 billion a year. So what's gone wrong?
    Individuals who file false or trivial claims of domestic violence are accorded the same standing by the abuse shelters, law enforcement, and courts as the most seriously battered women. In a system rife with fraudulent claims, it is easy to understand why the Jane Williamson's of the world are being silenced while abuse shelters, law enforcement personnel, and social welfare programs are profiting handsomely.
      Prior to the July 19, 2005 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing for the reauthorization of VAWA, many people, including myself, tried to tell our side about the failures of VAWA. Several scientists with decades of experience studying the dynamics of intimate partner violence also asked to testify at this hearing. However, even after running full-page ads in the Washington D.C. based newspapers expressing our concerns, we were all denied time to speak at the hearing.
     So who did testify? A retired NBA basketball legend, a movie star, and a vice president of a cosmetics company. If these are qualifications the U.S. Senate considers appropriate for someone to testify as an expert witness on the subject matter of VAWA, whom would they invite to testify about violence on prime time TV?  A few Tibetan monks perhaps? 
     The existing system must be solving some concern or no one would support it. Then whom does it help and in what ways?
       It is well known and documented that false allegations of domestic violence have long been the tactical weapon of choice to gain advantage in divorce and custody cases. This provides financial rewards not just to the women, but also to the states through a vast array of federal funding sources, many of which have nothing to do with domestic violence. Examples include increased incentives from federal child support collection funding, TANF, HUD and many others, giving the states as much incentive to perpetuate the fraud as those that are actually perpetrating it.
       Two special reports from RADAR - Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting are worthwhile reading: Perverse Incentives, False Allegations, and Forgotten Children outlines the monetary motivators for filing false allegations of domestic violence and An Epidemic of Civil Rights Abuses: Ranking of States’ Domestic Violence Laws covers which states provide the greatest incentives for perpetrating these acts of fraud.
     The bottom line is our abuse support system seems to be supporting everyone except the severely abused. They have no shelter.
Terri Lynn Tersak is a professional commercial photographer, the President and CEO of True Equality Network, and a member of the Steering and Legislative Committees for the Maryland based think-tank, RADAR - Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting.

NOTE: If you would like to be removed from our mailing list please respond to this message with REMOVE in the subject line. Comments or criticisms of our policies or Web sites should be addressed to mailto:comments@ejfi.org.
     You are receiving this message because (1) you asked to be added to our mailing list; (2) you sent the EJF an e-mail or requested help from us; (3) you are known to work on issues related to men's or father's rights; (4) you are known to be interested in civil liberties and equal justice for all; (5) your name and address appeared as an addressee on email sent to us; or (6) you are a member of or contribute to the Equal Justice Foundation.
                      Issues of interest to the Equal Justice Foundation http://www.ejfi.org/  are:
Civilization                             http://www.ejfi.org/Civilization/Civilization.htm
Courts and Civil Liberties  http://www.ejfi.org/Courts/Courts.htm
Domestic Violence              http://www.ejfi.org/DV/dv.htm
     Domestic Violence Against Men in Colorado http://www.dvmen.org/
     Emerson case                                                      http://www.ejfi.org/emerson.htm
Families and Marriage                         http://www.ejfi.org/family/family.htm
Prohibitions and the War On Drugs  http://www.ejfi.org/Prohibition/Prohibition.htm
Vote Fraud and Election Issues         http://www.ejfi.org/Voting/Voting.htm
   The Equal Justice Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation supported by members and contributions. Dues are $25 per year and you may join at http://www.ejfi.org/Join.htm. Additional information about the Foundation can be found at http://www.ejfi.org/Intro.htm. Ideas on what you might do to help are outlined at http://www.ejfi.org/What_you_can_do.htm.
    Contributions are tax deductible and can be made on the Web at http://www.ejfi.org/join2.htm or by sending a check to the address below. Federal employees in Colorado can contribute to the EJF through the Combined Federal Campaign. We are listed in six Colorado regions. In the Denver region our agency number is 4086. In Pike's Peak #6024. In Larimer County # 8032. In Weld County # 4022. In SW Colorado (Mesa Verde-Durango) # A003. In 2006 we will also be listed in western Colorado and Utah.
Charles E. Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A.
Equal Justice Foundation http://www.ejfi.org/
455 Bear Creek Road
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906-5820
Personal home page: http://corry.ws
Curriculum vitae: http://www.marquiswhoswho.net/charleselmocorry/Default.aspx

The good men may do separately is small compared with what they may do collectively.
Benjamin Franklin

More on domestic Violence:

A mega collection of studies here:


There are some very interesting numbers from the VAWA/DOJ study here: