The film 'Basic
Instinct' sparked outrage and protest
by the lesbian community because
the movie finally recognized lesbians
as a group, but portrayed a lesbian
as a murderer. The film 'Shakes
the Clown' caused a similar reaction
by the clowning industry when clowns
were finally recognized as a group,
but a clown was portrayed as a drunk.
The documentary
'Breaking the Silence' is inciting
much outrage by fathers because
custodial fathers were finally recognized
as a group, but all the fathers
were identified as child abusers.
The lesbians and
clowns were reacting to a fictional
screenplay whose writer had the
luxury of portraying anyone as a
murderer or a drunk, but consciously
decided to choose one of them. Fathers
across the country are reacting
to a 'factual' documentary whose
writer had the luxury of disclosing
any single parent abusing their
children, but consciously decided
to choose fathers.
Many fathers are
trying to uncover the hidden
agenda and conspiracy theory that
motivated this attack on custodial
fathers that is promoted by the
creator as a "Children's Story".
Is the
Public Broadcasting Service
(PBS) attempting to indoctrinate
our children to hate their father?
Is the
Mary Kay Ash Foundation attempting
to fund the elimination of the
Parental Alienation Syndrome
(PAS), or attempting to validate
the
Violence Against Women Act (VAWA)?
As stated on the
PBS website: "PBS's reputation
for quality reflects the public's
trust in the editorial integrity
of PBS content and the process by
which it is produced and distributed.
To maintain that trust, PBS and
its member stations are responsible
for shielding the creative and editorial
processes from political pressure
or improper influence from funders
or other sources. PBS also must
make every effort to ensure that
the content it distributes satisfies
those editorial standards designed
to assure integrity."
The creators of
this PBS expose' attempt to illuminate the
seamy underbelly and sinister underpinnings
of a secret threat to our children
that has been so diligently
covered up by the media. The
investigation focused on 15% of
the 14 million parents who
were awarded custody of their children
by order of the Family Court. Using
the domestic violence allegation
data from the recent Congressional
hearings regarding Violence Against
Women, and the hip-hop regarding
70% of all fathers who want custody
gets it, and the allegations of
Judicial corruption from the NOW
Family Court Report- this crack
team of experts chose to find 'abused'
children amongst custodial
fathers and allege that PAS is junk
science.
The cover story
of
Time magazine (12-95) also attempted
to identify a threat to our children, but
it was not advertised as a children's
story. The
magazine cover showed a perfect
angel who was swept into a series
of unfortunate events after
her mother wrestled custody from
her father. The story was entitled:
'Abandoned to her Fate', 'Neighbors,
teachers, and the authorities all
knew Elisa Esquardo was being abused,
but somehow nobody managed to stop
it'. Time magazine did not focus
their attention on finding
more 'abused' children amongst custodial
mothers and allege that Post Partum
Depression, Premenstrual Syndrome,
and Munchausen’s by Proxy Syndrome
were junk science. Time magazine
looked into the Family Court system,
and then took a close look at Foster
Care, and I wish they had kept up
the good work.
The silence is
still unbroken regarding the Family
Law system that provokes and encourages
broken families, which increases
the likelihood of child neglect
or abuse. The Foster Care
industry will not receive Federal
funding if the number of children
captured by the system does not
continue to grow. Forcing custody
of the children on the parent who
is financially unable to support
them also serves to maximize the
cash flow between parents through
the court. An aggressive child support
award may allow Child Support Enforcement
(CSE) and Temporary Aid to Needy
Families (TANF) to finally reap
Federal funding when the breadwinning
parent is driven to self-unemployment.
The CSE, TANF, and Foster Care costs
must be repaid with interest by
the self-employed parent who was
taken from the lives of their children.
Fathers, who have
already had their fill of defending
themselves against baseless allegations
in Family Court, are constantly
being forced to defend fathers in
general from an endless barrage
of the same. Books are being written
celebrating the success of single
mothers and lesbians in separating
fathers from exceptional children:
‘Raising Boys Without Men: How Maverick
Moms Are Creating the Next Generation
of Exceptional Men’ by
Peggy Drexler. Are fathers supposed
to retaliate by funding the creation
of ‘Raising Girls Without Women:
How Maverick Dads Are Creating the
Next Generation of Exceptional Women’
by
Bob Uecker? Are fathers expected
to fund a feature film to allege
the truth to combat this infamy
launched by those paid by the taxpayers
to do it?
The victims of
Family Law and others are forced
to wage war on the Divorce Industry
without taxpayer funding.
Glenn Sacks is currently demanding
equal time on behalf of fathers
regarding PBS programming.
Michael Robinson is keeping
Shared Parenting on the table and
helping the legislature evaluate
the status of men in Sacramento.
David Burroughs is making sure
fathers and the victims of misdirected
anguish are being heard regarding
the VAWA renewal on Capital Hill.
Stephen Baskerville continues
to deliver the ‘coups de grâce’
to Family Law in many highly respected
publications.
Wendy McElroy and
Phyllis Schlafly continue to
convince the public that gender
has nothing to do with it.
California parents of all genders
are gathering signatures until this
February to push the Shared Parenting
ballot Initiative. Many others continue
to somehow protest the Family Law
system in any way they see fit.
Parents who wish to stop funding
the opposition may realize they
must stop paying taxes. |