In my case, I
could prove, FROM THE RECORD, that
my ex had lied UNDER OATH at least
One day, I went to the clerk's office
to ask for a clerk-magistrate hearing
to consider the charge of perjury.
They told me to go down the street
to the DA's office. That was in Woburn.
The Woburn DA's office told me to
go to the Middlesex County DA's office.
That office told me to go to the Commonwealth
AG's office in Boston. And that office
in turn referred me -- where else
-- back to the Woburn Clerk's office!
I spent an entire day going around
in a circle for nothing.
Well, not really for nothing. I did
it in part knowing I was on a fool's
errand, but wanting to PROVE it.
A couple of years later, I tried again
at the Clerk's office. And they tried
to push me onto the same circle, until
I told them that I wasn't having anything
of it. So they actually sent out the
notice for a perjury hearing. So I
showed up for the hearing -- AND I
WAS THE ONE WHO GOT ARRESTED!
My ex took the summons seriously --
as well she should have since she
knew how many lies she'd told -- even
though she was also naive for believing
that the Commonwealth takes perjury
seriously. So she complained to a
copp that I'd violated my restraining
order, and there was a warrant for
my arrest. Naturally, no cop ever
actually went out of his way to enforce
the warrant. Instead, she waited until
the hearing, then informed the cleerk
that there was this warrant for my
arrest. They looked it up and agreed,
and I was arreted on the spot.
In the meanwhile, I never got my hearing
for perjury. But on the other hand,
this was the arrest that lead to my
successful lawsuit, so this time at
least I got SOMETHING out of it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill" <jwwiii@HOTMAIL.COM
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: misrepresentation
Are you asking if the fox will
guard the coop? There are laws
against perjury which are seldom enforced
in even the most blatant cases.
I have tried to no avail to prosecute
perjury laws in probable cause
hearings to get the DA to act.
It was a total waste of time.
The OATH is a joke. Only the ignorant
believe it means something.
The only punishment is you may lose
some credibility and the Judge
will reflect that in his findings.
----- Original Message -----
From: "bee" <sels56@YAHOO.COM
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 12:28
if an attorney knowingly lies
to the court in a pleading (motion,
etc) either on his own behalf or on
behalf of his client, and
either in the same case or in
a parallel case (as a way of showing
the attorney's lack of integrity
and reliability of his assertions
in the instant case), are there
statutory laws and/or case laws that
require the judge in the instant
case to take action against that attorney?
I know that there is 18 USC
(Misprision of Felony), but I am looking
for something stronger to require
the judge to take action against the
attorney or evaluation of that