Home Recommended Products Contact Us
 
 
Home
Resources & Links
Fatherlessness Statistics
Child Support
Legal Resources
Search This Site
Bad Judges List
Free Templates
Restraining Orders
Judicial Abuse Stories
Father's Stories
Legal Help & Referrals
Constitutional Rights
Donate
Table of Contents
Terms & Conditions
 
 
Signup for Newsletter
 
E-mail:  
 
 
Search Site
 
 
 
 
 
 
Suing a Judge
 
 

I am Terrence, in Bakersfield.  Here's my short version overview of my particular situation.
THE FACTS OF THE KID NAPPING AND EXTORTION. INVOLVED IN THE LIFE'S
OF LYRIC SHAE ANNE ,FISCHER, BLAKE STEVEN, FISCHER, AND TERRENCE
STEVEN,FISCHER PERPETUATED AND INFLICTED BY THE UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT . / beginning IN 1994 TO THE PRESENT

OPENING:AND OR THE THE FOUNDATION.,
THE FOLLOWING ARE ALL UNDISPUTED FACT.
I AM Terrence Steven,Fischer my sons are Blake Steven,Fischer , and Alec sherlock...and my daughter is Lyric Shae Anne, Fischer.
I have NEVER been a danger to my children.
I have been forced away from my children by the united states government ALL under threat duress and coercion......AND asked to
pay moneys for time i am forced away from them.
I have NEVER went to any so called "court " willingly but only under threat ,duress, and coercion to keep in contact with my
children.
I have always wanted at least half time share with my children.
I have NEVER wanted to keep my children away from their mothers.
I have present undisputed evidence that my children's mothers were unstable, were openly trying to stop so called "visits" with me ,
have committed perjury AND have filed false claims with the local child protective services. The court did nothing.
I have personally witnessed judges changing court minutes and making "orders" based on no facts at all AND not allowing evidence
to prove the facts.
I have personally witnessed judges stopping the recording of proceedings for no logical reason.
I have personally witnessed "attorneys" committing
BARRATRY, COLLUSION TO COMMIT FRAUD, PERJURY AND SLANDER IN OPEN
COURT, THE COURT BEING TOLD OF THE CRIMES, AND THE COURT DOING
NOTHING.

DEFINITION OF TERMS....
I.E. ' KID NAPPING", EXTORTION'....' COLOR OF LAW"
heres a un detailed over view......
basically my children Blake Steven, Fischer and Lyric Shae Anne,
Fischer have been kid napped and held for ransom. ..UNDER THE
COLOR OF LAW..{ IN K.C.S.C. CASES 21376 AND 576424}JUST SO YOU
UNDERSTAND THE TERMS .#1.{ for the record...Main Entry: kidĚnapĚping
Variant: or kidĚnapĚing
Function: noun
: an act or instance or the crime of seizing, confining, inveigling, abducting, or carrying away a person by force or fraud often with a
demand for ransom { this would be so called CHILD SUPPORT..}.or in furtherance of another crime
.....#2.{.extortion...extortion

n 1: an exorbitant charge { this would be so called CHILD SUPPORT..}.2: unjust exaction (as by the misuse of authority); "the
extortion by dishonest officials of fees for performing their sworn duty" 3: the felonious act of extorting money (as by threats of
violence)
.........#3..
COLOR OF LAW
n : a mere semblance of legal right; something done with the apparent authority of law but actually in contravention of law; "the
plaintiff claimed that under color of law the officer had deprived him of his civil rights" [syn:

WHAT THE LAW STATES RIGHT NOW..[higher court decisions}
1.Marbury v. Madison , 5 us 137;
All laws repugnant to the Constitution are NULL and VOID.
Byars v. U.S., 273 US 28;
The court MUST liberally construe law in favor of the Citizen.
Boyd v. U.S., 116 US 616;
Court MUST protect against encroachments upon secured liberties.
. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436;
Constitutional guarantees cannot be abrogated/derogated by
legislative or rule making..
Norton v. Shelby County,118 US 425;
Conflicting "public policy" is NOT valid Law and cannot compel
performance.


NOTE ABOUT CORRUPT JUDGES:

U.S. Vs. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th. Cir. 1985), 31 Judges were removed  rom the bench after a Federal Court Ordered an
investigation, it was confirmed   aiding & abetting from the inferior Courts to the Federal Court, violations at every level with
no one reporting the crimes! The United States Supreme Court  Acknowledged the judicial corruption, when it
stated that there where many         dishonest judges exposed & convicted through "Operation Greylord", a labyrinthine federal
Investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago, Bracey Vs. Gramley,  case     No. 96-6133 (June 9,
1997)           
                 
The Court in Yates Vs. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that, "Not every action by any
judge is in exercise of his judicial function. It is not a judicial function for a Judge to commit an intentional tort even
though the tort occurs in the Courthouse. When a judge acts as a Trespasser        of     the Law, when a judge does not follow the
law, the judge loses subject    matter jurisdiction & The Judge's orders are void, of no legal force or effect."
The United States Supreme Court has stated that "No State legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution
without violating his Undertaking to support it".
Cooper Vs. Aaron. 358 U.S. 1 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958). If a judge does not fully Comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, in
re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is Without jurisdiction, & he/she has engaged in an act or acts TREASON.

{MIND YOU THIS IS AN INDIVIDUAL CASE AND THE COMMON SENSE PRINCIPLES
HERE DO NOT APPLY IN ALL CASES}

In my effort to address and settle this matter through lawful and valid remedy, I reserve ALL rights without prejudice in accordance
with the constitution of the state of California Article 1 sec 1,2 and especially "4" , the constitution of the united states of
America article 4 sec. 4, article 5 section 2, amendments 1 , 9, and 10.
Also, and /or ,the administrative Procedures Act of 1946 , and pursuant to UCC 1-207,1-311,1-308,1-103 ,2-302,3-302,3-305,3-
501,and 3-505.
now "IF" you read all this and are still not sure there are crimes within our judicial system going on .......please just
leave the Americas.!

just add on stuff.

Pro se/in pro per/sui juris litigants must be treated with "special care because they occupy a position significantly
different from that of litigants represented by counsel."
SOMERVILLE V. HALL,2F.3D 1563,1564 {11TH CIR.1993} AND JOHNSON V. PULLMAN, 845 F 2ND 911,914 {11TH CIR.1988}

Terrence Steven,Fischer asks ALL COSTS pursuant to F.S. Section 86.011 and F.S section 57.041 for the defense of this action.

"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. It wasn't the world being round that agitated
people, but that the world wasn't flat. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the
truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic." 
 ...Dresden James