My story goes like
this: I was divorced in January 1999.
It was a 4 day divorce trial that
involved my father more than myself.
Judge Robert Terry split everything
50/50. She got all the assets and
I got all the debts. You heard it
all before... February 27,2000, the
home in which my ex and 3 daughters
were living in, was destroyed by fire.
The next day, restraining order saying
I set the fire (although to this day
the state fire marshal never said
it was an arson fire). 2 months later,
extended. six months later, extended.
One year later, made PERMANENT!
Now I'm pissed. I
hired the best lawyer in town and
started putting up flyers all around
the county saying that Judge Terry
is abusing my children. (I got arrested
and charged with harassment). One
year later and $7,500 poorer I switched
to a high profile Boston civil rights
firm. $10,000 later I could not see
my daughters so I dropped the "firm"
and went back a "local"
"affordable" attorney. 2003
my 2 younger daughters wanted to see
me and things have been great with
them ever since. We see each other
every weekend and whenever they want
during the week. Now for my oldest
daughter... I hired Dr. John Daignault
to evaluate the situation. "Worst
case of PAS he has ever seen"
But Judge Terry says its my fault
because I should not have burned the
child's home down. He has it set in
his own mind and has dismissed the
state fire marshal's report. It comes
down to this... I've spent 6 years
and almost $40,000 and my daughter
still hates me because of what her
mother has told her. Going to court
is like beating a dead horse. But
I wake up every morning, look in the
mirror and ask..."What can I
do for my child today?"
For what it's worth;
it took me one year, over 30 faxes
to the courthouse, approximately 60
telephone calls and three motions
to release the GAL report to me! (This
is the courts way of using up my valuable
time and resources to ask for something
that is required by law). Then
when they gave me the GAL report less
than 30 days before trial and had
a bunch of attachments. The
two major ones were; if any of this
information leaked out to anyone,
then I would forfeit the marital home.
If I reproduced this document and
anyway I would once again forfeit
all marital assets. Let me remind
you, this was all rearranged with
her lawyer and all that the judge
had to do was signed a bottom-line.
I've reprimanded the judge at trial
saying that she was illogical to sign
such a hideous order. I embarrassed
her by saying she was inhumane.
What judge in their left mind that
would evict would a quadriplegic
from his marital home after that quadriplegic
has spent over $100,000 to modify
the house for his living. What
judge would send a quadriplegic to
a nursing home while his estranged
in a brand-new house? I have
all the documentation if anyone is
interested in seeing how ludicrous
judges are in signing lawyers proposed
orders. When I was in trial
I looked at the lawyer while giving
testimony in the court officer told
me to address the judge. I told
him I was addressing the person who
is in charge of this case, who was
her lawyer. They did not find
am very sorry for your loss and that
of your daughter who has been permanently
harmed by this judge no doubt after
exposure of these crimes by judges
and federal law suits will help in
immunity has allowed them to do anything
they want, even unconstitutional actions
which become void and make them personally
JJC is a JOKE!! You will eventually
get a letter saying they completed
their "investigation" and
found insufficient grounds to do anything.
is a stall tactic to let you cool
down and most say they do nothing,
not even interview or talk to the
injured parties. It is a clear case
of the foxes watching the hen house.
U.S. Supreme court cases have opened
the door to federal suits for civil
right violations against fathers and
the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, previously
used by the state to hide behind and
get federal case thrown out is disintegrating.
I think the window is now open to
sue successfully and hold both judges
and the state responsibly for their
legal standard to terminate parental
rights is "Strict scrutiny"
which is very high and they must prove
you are causing "actual harm"
to your children.
course, we know this is all about
money and sexual prejudice. The state
gets HUNDREDS of million of dollars
in federal funding for separating
fathers from their families in the
form of federal kickbacks for higher
child support etc.
FIGHT! FIGHT FOR YOUR CHILDREN AND
YOUR RIGHTS! SUE THE BASTARD IN FEDERAL
you need lots of money to BUY justice.
Of you are alone the learning curve
to know what you need to know is 1-2
years acting Pro Se and by then it
is too late.
you hear about recent case in VT where
a many was banded from the courthouse
for having Judge "SOandSO"
is a butcher of the constitution on
his pickup truck. He was awarded
$250,000 from the county and $50,001
from the sheriff who served the warrant
like "harassment" is a stretch
if you were telling the truth - 1st
Amendment rights and all.
said federal court for civil right
violations is probably the only way
courts are completely corrupt and
protect their own people at all costs
- including conspiracy, collusion,
bribery and by sending each other
business as payoffs.
several people suing judges in federal
court now and expect this to become
very common until this abuse stops.
Sounds like we have similar wives.
spends hours demonizing me to her
friend and family because her self-esteem
is so low she can't have anyone believe
she could be at fault for our marriage
going south. This with over
15 years of mental health treatment
history with Paxil (changing her own
dosage), crazy behavior, paranoia and
lots more. She hid this well before
the marriage and it got progressively
worse. I think the Paxil helped at
first but then made it worse.
Problem is judges choose not to believe
the man the "she said" standard,
so you basically need video of a mom
shooting heroin in front of the kids
to prove a mother is unfit or lots
of independent witnesses.
Expert witnesses, examination by doctors
and the like. Broken arms are common
for kids and do not translate into
bad mother or fathers as accidents
happen but a history of mental issues,
bad judgment that endangers the children
etc. might get you somewhere. Problem
is gathering this is very difficult
to do and prove.
is so much lying in family court only
what she admits and independent experts