Home Recommended Products Contact Us
 
 
Home
Resources & Links
Fatherlessness Statistics
Child Support
Legal Resources
Search This Site
Bad Judges List
Free Templates
Restraining Orders
Judicial Abuse Stories
Father's Stories
Legal Help & Referrals
Constitutional Rights
Donate
Table of Contents
Terms & Conditions
 
 
Signup for Newsletter
 
E-mail:  
 
 
Search Site
 
 
 
 
 
 
Custody and Visitation Time With Children
 
A decision is near from the Wisconsin Supreme Court on the interpretation of the word "maximize" in thier custody statute. While Michigan does not use the word "maximize" in their Child Custody Act, the roughly analogous clause is highlighted in red below:
 
MCL 722.27a - Parenting Time
(1) Parenting time shall be granted in accordance with the best interests of the child. It is presumed to be in the best interests of a child for the child to have a strong relationship with both of his or her parents. Except as otherwise provided in this section, parenting time shall be granted to a parent in a frequency, duration, and type reasonably calculated to promote a strong relationship between the child and the parent granted parenting time.
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/printDocument.aspx?objectName=mcl-722-27a&version=txt
 
In both states the issue of the amount of parenting time (Wisconsin's term is placement) may be analyzed as to what the various words and clauses mean and if they are mandatory or hortatory. There may be much to learn from reading the petition and briefs, listening to the oral argument and the opinion which is due shortly.
 

 
 
By Gregg Herman
Feb. 8, 2006
 
On Dec. 13, 2005, the Wisconsin Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Landwehr v. Landwehr, 2003AP2555, a case presenting the issue of the proper standard of review when determining a motion to modify physical placement. Letís hope the high court relies heavily upon a recent court of appeals opinion before rendering its decision in this case.
 
Landwehr focuses squarely on two statutes that seem to conflict. The pre-judgment statute, Wis. Stat. ß 767.24(4)(a)(2), requires a court to set a placement schedule that maximizes the amount of time a child spends with each parent. Meanwhile, the post-judgment statute, Wis. Stat. 767.325(1)(b)2, presumes that the current allocation of physical placement is in the best interest of a child.
 
...

http://www.wislawjournal.com/archive/2006/0208/herman-020806.html
 

 
Landwehr v Landwehr Petition and Briefs
http://www.wisconsinfathers.org/landwehr.htm
 
Landwehr Oral Argument (Requires Windows Media)
mms://sc-media.wicourts.gov/03AP2555.wma